<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ritz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:20:08 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20404</guid>
		<description>Well, the conclusion to that one, girls, must be : never trust a man with bad spelling.
And that goes for Nicolas too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the conclusion to that one, girls, must be : never trust a man with bad spelling.<br />
And that goes for Nicolas too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20390</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20390</guid>
		<description>OK. Accept that. However...&#039;illy sounds very old and deserves an archaic label&#039;...The Columbian Guide to AMERICAN English 1993, Columbia University Press. Appropriate, I suggest for our &#039;ladybirds&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. Accept that. However&#8230;&#8217;illy sounds very old and deserves an archaic label&#8217;&#8230;The Columbian Guide to AMERICAN English 1993, Columbia University Press. Appropriate, I suggest for our &#8216;ladybirds&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20360</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20360</guid>
		<description>Thierry,

“Beauty is jealous, and illy bears the presence of a rival&quot; (Thomas Jefferson). Source: The American Heritage ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

What an utter fool I must have been, I do apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thierry,</p>
<p>“Beauty is jealous, and illy bears the presence of a rival&#8221; (Thomas Jefferson). Source: The American Heritage ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition</p>
<p>What an utter fool I must have been, I do apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20349</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20349</guid>
		<description>I am not sure what variety of the English language Alliance Lucy or Lucy claim to be familiar with, but such a word as &quot;illy&quot; certainly does not appear in either the Oxford Dictionary of English nor the Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary of English. It is a classic example of how to bastadize (verb, pg.63., Oxford Pocket Dictionary) a language in the most illiterate, ugly and ill-founded way.

Terry Harris, Cambridge, England.

ps I would ask you to disregard the sanctimonious attitude of the two &#039;ladybirds&#039; in question and suggest they get a life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure what variety of the English language Alliance Lucy or Lucy claim to be familiar with, but such a word as &#8220;illy&#8221; certainly does not appear in either the Oxford Dictionary of English nor the Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary of English. It is a classic example of how to bastadize (verb, pg.63., Oxford Pocket Dictionary) a language in the most illiterate, ugly and ill-founded way.</p>
<p>Terry Harris, Cambridge, England.</p>
<p>ps I would ask you to disregard the sanctimonious attitude of the two &#8216;ladybirds&#8217; in question and suggest they get a life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.petiteanglaise.com/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20338</link>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2007/04/17/ritz/#comment-20338</guid>
		<description>I too was surprised to see you in Glamour, just a month after I saw La Coquette.  It did kind of freak me out though that I recognized the two of you straight away without having to read your names, considering the fact that I&#039;ve never met either of you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was surprised to see you in Glamour, just a month after I saw La Coquette.  It did kind of freak me out though that I recognized the two of you straight away without having to read your names, considering the fact that I&#8217;ve never met either of you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
